I still hate the Chancellor
Dec. 2nd, 2008 01:54 pmso this whole VAT cut issue. Not only is it still causing me mountains of hassle at work, but I really am starting to get annoyed with it from a consumer point of view. How is it supposed to encourage me to shop?
I bought fidget a new collar yesterday, as he lost his purple one (the new one is an incredibly cutesy pale baby blue - icky, but it was that or baby pink!). It was £2.99 on the shelf. "Fair enough" says I, and buys it. At the till, I get my VAT discount. A whole 7p. Oooooh.
And today, I bought a skirt from Next (I have a thing about skirts right now, I need more of them! probably because they always fit better than trousers). Label says £30. Goes through the till, it actually costs me £29.36. A saving of a whole 64p. Makes no difference to my brain when it comes to rationalising the cost, because if the label had said £29.36, my brain would have just gone "ok, its £30" and carried on from there.
So what is the point????
I bought fidget a new collar yesterday, as he lost his purple one (the new one is an incredibly cutesy pale baby blue - icky, but it was that or baby pink!). It was £2.99 on the shelf. "Fair enough" says I, and buys it. At the till, I get my VAT discount. A whole 7p. Oooooh.
And today, I bought a skirt from Next (I have a thing about skirts right now, I need more of them! probably because they always fit better than trousers). Label says £30. Goes through the till, it actually costs me £29.36. A saving of a whole 64p. Makes no difference to my brain when it comes to rationalising the cost, because if the label had said £29.36, my brain would have just gone "ok, its £30" and carried on from there.
So what is the point????
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 02:22 pm (UTC)And then this morning I found out what it's all about. Small businesses have delayed putting invoices through until this week, thereby charging 15% to their customers, but the raw materials which they bought were all charged at 17.5% which they can reclaim, pocketing the 2.5% difference. It's so the government can give a big wad of cash to businesses, while dressing it up as being consumer-friendly.
If you want to get even more angry about where your tax money is going, read this (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7746174.stm).
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:44 pm (UTC)this whole country is a shambles
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:58 pm (UTC)I think it has its merits...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:56 pm (UTC)Of course if lots of stores are in fact doing the VAT discounting at the tills then it won't be businesses that directly benefit at all, it will be the consumers, admitidely to a very small degree. While obviously it's sneaky by the government, you can't entirely blame them for the greed of the small companies.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:27 pm (UTC)That 2.13% saving is not going to get me out spending more money. Yes, fine, at work it's saving us something like £1,200. On our £50k rent.
It's all perspective. A £500 TV you'd save something like £8. And of course, that's the difference between buying a purchase of that size or not. Right? Er...
(Also, skirts are awesome. Next have/had some really funky tartan ones that I liked a lot, and I may treat myself now that my car service and MOT cost less than planned!)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:42 pm (UTC)the skirt I am wearing today is the matching green one (just the knee length variety).
Next have some great stuff in at the moment!